The evils of capitalism can be seen in Jane Eyre through Mr Rochester's actions. Despite the nature of his crimes, such as imprisoning his wife against her will and attempting bigamy, he remains completely unpunished by the law, which demonstrates the control that the higher classes have over all aspects of life, including crime and punishment. It could be suggested that had Mr Rochester been a working-class man, he would have been severely punished for at very least the attempt at bigamy.
Working to middle class inequalities can also be seen in Jane's efforts to find a place to stay and some work to do after running away from her failed wedding. Due to her working-class appearance, she is turned away from almost everywhere until she almost starves upon the doorstep of a seemingly wealthy family. This is a blatant show that capitalism as a system to live by fails those who cannot live up to the standards of those wealthier than they are. Had it not been for the socialist spirit of the man of the house, Jane could have died on the doorstep of wealth.
This is interesting. So it's a novel about the need for wealth? Can it only be read in this way? Is there any humanity expressed that doesn't relate to wealth and status?
ReplyDelete